Category: Atheism

  • Crosses

    Posted By Martin S Pribble

    I don’t normally do poetry but yesterday I awoke with some of this running around my head. Thanks to Monica for allowing me to cross-post this here.

    Crosses

    Cross yourself and speak unto Jesus
    And hope for the species that the people deceased
    Are released from the pain and the suffering
    Your faith is decreasing, the pages are creasing
    In the only book you’ve been reading.
    The idea is appealing, but somehow revealing
    Of the fear that you’re breeding.

    And you’re left needing…

    You’re only human.
    A part of this species that does as it pleases.
    If you do what they tell you then you will be free,
    Dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s,
    Putting crosses in boxes like a job application
    Delivered not into temptation but redemption
    And carry the cross on your chest like disease
    The people beneath us will be recieved above,
    And you will be there to receive all the love.

    Still you cross your chest as you cross your fingers,
    And cross your legs too for there’s evil down there,
    And preach the love as the hatred increases,
    The cross on your chest, double-crossing the rest,
    Treating others like feces.

    As the crosses increase for the people beneath us
    Crossing your chest as you cross your fingers
    The hope that you’ll be received
    And haven’t been deceived,
    That the Jesus you speak of
    Is real and forgiving.
    You give up on living, your life is in pieces
    Dashed against rocks, or stoned for your failings.

    The bible tells you you’ll go to heaven,
    You’ve been told this since before you were seven,
    But even now you have doubts,
    The cross is a crutch to reassure you.
    Crossing your fingers and crossing your chest, if you’re good, and love Jesus, you’ll see heaven with the rest.
    See, he died for you
    And when you leave the species you’ll be with him too…

    Cross your fingers…

    Originally posted at Martin S Pribble.

  • How much for your baby?

    How much for your baby?

    Before you get all critical on me, the only reason why I am refuting a point with bible verses, is because the bible is the source, and justification for the bigotry I am trying to destroy. Women deserve the right to do as they please with their bodies, according to their marital, financial, housing status, and all those very important considerations.

    Furthermore, my purpose is strictly to point out to those who believe the bible is literal, that the bible refutes itself, and in doing so, nullifies its validity.

    With that having been said, I’d also like to mention that I wouldn’t like to be in this situation; or, if I had a daughter, I wouldn’t want her to find herself in the situation to have to consider an abortion, but I certainly would want her to have the right to choose. I also don’t want to be labeled Pro-Choice. Have you ever seen those MRI exams? Speak with your kids about contraception. Pronto!

    Six weeks old human fetus

    According to the bible, god has assessed the right value to all unborn babies, even if you are a Christian, you probably didn’t know the following:

    In Exodus 21:22-23 it’s stipulated that if an attack on a woman leads to a miscarriage the attacker must pay a fine. If he causes serious damage to the mother “you have to take life for life”. This implies that a fetus is not as valuable as a woman before the eyes of god.

    In Leviticus 27:6 a price, yes, monetary value is assigned to a baby’s life, according to its age and gender. Babies under one month old are worthless.

    In Numbers 5:21-22, 27-28 some magical potion given to the Israelites by god is used to determine paternity. If the father is not the husband, “her abdomen will swell and her womb will miscarry, and she will become a curse.” A fetus that is not the result of union between husband and wife, is sentenced to die. See, a bastard fetus is clearly of no value to god.

    Did no one else think of Jesus’ fate, had Joseph taken this super scientific paternity test?

    In Genesis 38:24 god’s law states that if a woman is to be executed, and she happens to be pregnant, there is no need to wait for her baby to be born. The fetus is counted as part of the mother, and so its fate is to be burned to death in its mother’s womb.

    It is irrational to let an ancient book rule our lives. This is the morality of a civilization who lived two thousand years ago. These are the people who thought The Earth was flat. We live in a privileged time, with so many scientific discoveries, and the technology that has allowed us to see beyond what we ever imagined, and thanks to these, we now understand the Universe and how it works — things that not too long ago were thought impossible.

    Humanity hasn’t come this far to let the ignorance from two thousand years ago be the guide by which we make our laws. Would you consider these biblical laws as acceptable punishment in the modern world? If your answer to that question is “yes,” then, would it be okay if I suggest you step away from this computer, stay away from my laws, and and go live with The Amish*?

    (*) No offense to The Amish.

  • We can’t save the world.. but, who’s trying?

    Every time I hear the phrase “save the world,” I can’t help but think about the superheroes, such as Superman; this implies that only someone with superpowers can save the world. These superheroes and superpowers do not exist in the real world. If you are a theist, then your superhero would be the god you worship, and its super power would be, um.. magic.

    But next I think: What does the world need to be saved from? As Sam Harris points out, in a different context, we need to rid the world of bad ideas. This was brought to mind recently by this article by my knowledgeable friend Paul Fidalgo. Please go read it, and come back for more.

    Then Paul’s article, as it usually happens in the blogsphere, generated reactions. My friend, and occasional contributor of this blog, Martin Pribble, posted his perspective on the subject, in this article. Please, go check it out. I’ll wait for you to come back.

    Are you back yet? Great! Welcome back.

    Excellent articles, right?

    It is not my purpose to oppose my friends’ points of view on the subject. Now I’ll give you my perspective.

    I want to point out that I don’t remember having ever signed up for any movement. I don’t belong to any atheist organization; nor do I desire to to be a part of any organized, official group of atheists; nor do I think such organization needs to exist. However, I do want to be counted among the 22%(?) of unbelievers worldwide, which is why I do not hesitate to speak up, every chance I have, (and seems propitious as opposed to useless and conflictive), about my lack of belief, and the reasons why I loath religion.

    I get it: It is tiresome, boring, sometimes repetitive — but it is necessary.

    For what it’s worth, it is not my style to have endless debates with theists, nor do I partake in the ‘in-fights.’ It is futile; a waste of time. If you’ve ever checked out my Twitter timeline, I only say things that are, hopefully, eye-opening.

    I think we are challenging unfounded beliefs. See, there is something about being wrong that is inherent to most human beings. To realize that one is wrong is, to say the very least, uncomfortable. Therefore, the people who are not religious, smug know-it-all’s, read something we write, and reflect on it, instead of lashing out with disproportionate rage and hatred when their beliefs are challenged, and realize that something doesn’t quite add up to their holy stories, are very unlikely to say out loud: “Oh! I have just realized how wrong I was! Please, teach me more.” No, that’s highly improbable. Someone who feels that something goes *click* in their head, will try to educate themselves, probably driven by an honest desire to prove us wrong. They will find a way to learn more about the subject, and will become thirsty for knowledge; once that spark has been lit, nothing can put it out. Nothing.

    That, my friends, is what I aim for.

    This silent journey of learning and self-discovery, my fellow unbeliever, might have even been how you grew out of your theism.

    As for lacking focus, like Marty says in his post, I foresee our ilk having a really hard time trying to get unbelievers to aim for the same goal. We can agree on many topics, but when it comes to interests and ideals, the whole ‘group focus’ can get blurry…

    We need to rid the world from bad ideas, which brings us back to where we started. How can we rid the world from bad ideas? By stopping the early indoctrination of such ideas. By speaking up; by raising awareness; by fighting for the right of every child to receive a proper education.

    Every child should have the right to receive a scientific education, an education based in facts and experiments, regardless of his or her parents’ religious beliefs. He or she should learn about Galileo Galilei, Pythagoras, and Newton; that the Sun is a star in the middle of our Solar System; and understand why humans and apes have shared ancestors who lived a few million years ago. For this to be feasible, we need the laws to change, and we need to enlighten the parents.

    We have no superpowers.  Unlike Superman, we cannot aim for legendary accomplishments. I would not try to save the world; it would be frustrating and unrealistic. Part of being successful is choosing one’s goals wisely.

    https://twitter.com/#!/Monicks/status/132306031123501056

    Religion may play a small role in the whole problems-of-the-world scheme, but it is an enabler of many, too many terrible things. It is in our laws, in our money, it narrows our rights, and, in extreme cases, stems terrible deeds against humanity.

    We can’t sit around and wait for the state of things to get worse. We need to do something if we want to see humanity headed for a better future, even knowing we won’t see this happen in our lifetime.

    Have a better plan of action? Let us now in the comments.