Tag: godless

  • Atheists have no moral compass

    Atheists have no moral compass

    One of the most perplexing, and recurring misconceptions about nonbelievers is that we have no moral compass. It has happened to me countless times, and if you’re like me, I’m sure it has happened to you, too. This inane idea that presupposes that atheists are unethical, horrible people, for morals can only come from god, and that ultimately atheists have no reason to be good, for they have no one to whom they must answer for their evil deeds…

    **facepalm**

    What is actually ironic is that atheists prove this assertion wrong every step of the way.

    OK, before you people get all literal on me, let’s define moral behavior, shall we? In my opinion it boils down to two basic considerations: Always minimize actual and potential suffering; always maximize actual and potential happiness.

    Please, don’t get me wrong. I am not saying that this is a characteristic exclusive to atheists — Nor am I saying that religious people are immoral. In fact, this is a feature common to all human beings, there are plenty of reasons for my assertion. Let’s explore a few of them:

    Neuro-chemistry — Oxytocin: It’s been scientifically studied that it affects our moral behavior. Paul Zak explains it on his TED Talk Trust, morality — and oxytocin.

    Empathy: You have most likely heard about empathy, haven’t you? It is what allows us to infer how other people feel in a particular situation. Unless you are a troubled individual with a history of abuse, or some specific psychological disorder, it is not in you to see anyone suffer, let alone would you want to ever be the cause of his or her affliction.

    Self-esteem: Let’s face it, nobody wants to feel like a pariah. It makes us feel good when we do good things for other people.

    Morality is a function of society, it comes from reason which precedes religions and best-selling-book author/gods, or supernatural constructs. They may have worshiped the moon and the sun, but they didn’t have the set of rules that religionists claim to be the absolute moral guide. Think about it — hadn’t it been for evolution and reason, humankind wouldn’t have been so successful. The first humans in Africa didn’t have anyone to teach them about gods and morality, it was how these early communities thrived — helping one another.

    We have no need for an external moral compass. We are moral because it is truly in us to be so. We are ethical because it is an inherent part of our character.

    This is precisely why atheists are bewildered by the recurring question believers pose to us on how will we know not to murder and rape without religion telling us not to do it. When you use this argument, to me it is terrifying. Basically what you are saying is that what stands between you and a serial killer is a fragile belief in a supernatural deity made up by illiterate people trying to figure out why the sun hid at night. The irony here is that believers use this argument supposedly from a position of moral superiority. No, this doesn’t go over well, theists.

    Finally, I would like to leave you with this thought: If you think an ancient book is the ultimate guide of morality, think again. This is a book where slavery is condoned, where rape is a matter of property, and where the main character demands of us that we murder people for imaginary crimes, like witchcraft.

    Related articles

    Bible verses on family values (monicks.net)
    Atheism and Spirituality – Ricky Gervais Explains How Atheists Have a Moral Compass Too (TrendHunter.com) (trendhunter.com)

  • From the Mailbox – “Ezekiel 23”

    Originally published at Martin S Pribble. Posted here with permission from Monica.

    My friend Monica left this request in my mailbox:

    Since we have discussed personally about many topics in the bible, and you have found reasonable explanations for some topics, here’s a tough one: – Ezekiel 23 has some really strange verses that I would like you to explore, with the help of your vast and knowledgeable audience.

    Well I was only familiar with one section of this verse, the one which reads:

    “There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.” Ezekiel 23:20

    Not that that is actually that relevant to the deciphering of this passage, it’s simply the most colourful bit of language from Ezekiel 23.

    It’s pretty obvious from the outset that Ezekiel 23 is a parable which uses the “whorish” behaviour of a pair of women as a metaphor for the unfaithful and ungodly behaviours of Israelites from two nations; “Oholah is Samaria, and Oholibah is Jerusalem.” The parable uses language that nears on pornography, and would no doubt make the most liberal Christian blush. What is interesting it that the language is uses phrases that not only makes the nations of Samaria and Jerusalem look bad and promiscuous, but also makes the actions of women seem unacceptable. The bible does a great job of showing women as untrustworthy and worthy of scorn. In fact, the depictions of women in this verse seem so impassioned and described in such a way that I think the author may have been enjoying writing it a little too much, if you catch my drift.

    Read the entire post and comments at Martin S Pribble.

    Comments are closed for this post. Have a comment? Leave it here.